Two days in the life of Saul Auslander, Hungarian prisoner working as a
member of the Sonderkommando at one of the Auschwitz Crematoriums who,
to bury the corpse of a boy he takes for his son, tries to carry out his
impossible deed: salvage the body and find a rabbi to bury it. While
the Sonderkommando is to be liquidated at any moment, Saul turns away of
the living and their plans of rebellion to save the remains of a son he
never took care of when he was still alive.

You
cannot take the Holocaust lightly in film. Some have tried, but it
fails. László Nemes' Son of Saul takes the Holocaust very seriously.
Instead of recounting it in a sombre documentary-esque way such as
Schindler's List or even the gut-wrenching approach Alain Resnais takes
to Night and Fog, we are utterly present in its unpredictable and
relentless horror. While most Holocaust films struggle between their
representation of order and chaos, often deciding to switch between the
two when necessary, Son of Saul finds the ideal balance, showing these
small shards of order within the chaos. The most fascinating idea of its
premise is to show the prisoners appointed with the tasks of guiding
victims into the gas chambers, organising their belongings and then
cleaning up after them. It's a well oiled and melancholic cog, while we
know every hard effort to scrub and pull is in vain as their eventual
death is only postponed and not evaded.
Saul, played by
first-timer and established poet Géza Röhrig, is one of those
Sonderkommando prisoners forced to work towards the Final Solution. Our
narrative follows him for only two days, but that's all we need to know
to get a gruelling snapshot of his minute-to-minute struggles. When a
boy nearly survives the gas but is pronounced dead shortly after, Saul
recognises him – at least on some level, as it's never clear if the boy
is his kin or not, but it is apparent he never took care of his own when
he had the chance – and takes him as his son. To himself, he insists on
giving his son a clandestine burial which must be officiated by a
rabbi. Salvaging the body, locating a rabbi and performing even a small
burial is near impossible despite them being in essentially a mass
graveyard. Meanwhile, his peers are plotting an escape along with
destroying the crematorium and will require Saul's help. However, he
cannot assist both futile missions simultaneously.
The film has
an incredibly unique approach to the concentration camps. Shot on a
tightly framed 35mm hand-held camera, the photography is almost always
focused on Saul, leaving the atrocities offscreen or out of focus, but
often vividly audible. If there is any complaint, it's that the editing
suffers from its long-take construction, but the sound design is an
absolute masterclass. Saul's face remains stoic but Röhrig soaks it all
in, leaving his mournful expression to interpretation. While he's
apparently numb, he's always fully invested in the moment. No scene is
quite as hard-hitting as when we watch Saul listen to the screams of
people dying in the chambers while he waits outside their doors. It's
his one break from being forced to work, and he'll immediately have to
remove bodies when it's finished. The way the film builds these routines
are very intimate and exhausting and despite being a fictionalised
story, it feels very real. Those rituals of removals and cleaning are
contrasted with the Jewish rituals that guide their faith, and
especially Saul's burial plan.
But beyond the intense yet
ambiguous horrors that show the cruellest side of humanity there's ever
been in the modern world – despite us never getting close to a Nazi
beside brief encounters – the film finds its emotional core in small
gestures of compassion. Nobody is required to help Saul, especially in
knowing the dangers involved, but there's an unspoken bond between every
prisoner to help one another regardless. When he finds the rabbi who
agrees to perform the service, it's not powerful because they've been
stripped down and Nazis are murdering new arrivals around them – nothing
compares to the experience of this scene – it's powerful because the
rabbi says yes in spite of that. If they can redeem one shred of
morality, it is a small victory and triumph of faith. Saul never lets go
of that idea, even when he risks sabotaging the escape mission
inadvertently. His mission to bury his son becomes increasingly
arbitrary, but never without redemptive merit on a grand scale.
This
is an astounding debut film for László Nemes on every level. Even a
seasoned visionary director would struggle in such a precise execution.
Having worked for the excellent Hungarian director Béla Tarr, his
influence is clearly felt here. Tarr also uses long shots and utilises
impassive protagonists but Nemes' work is much more dense, engaging, and
arguably accessible in its own way but mostly for the immediate empathy
the situation earns. While it matches Tarr's poetry, it's a lot more
theatrically dramatic. Every one of the supporting cast is on a razor's
edge though they never outshine the constantly pushed, pulled, and
shoved Röhrig. He need not step in front of the camera again after this
soon to be iconic accomplishment. The film's power is immobilising and
thoroughly unforgiving, but with good reason. Son of Saul, with its
immaculate production, attention to detail, and own noble mission, is
not only one of the best of the year but one of the best of the decade.
Despite its small scope, it dwarfs every other film on offer this year.
Please visit and download the movie here: